winter                   Back to the articles list | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Abstract:   (31 Views)

Introduction
Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), a key inhibitory neurotransmitter, regulates neural networks and maintains balance in brain activity. It suppresses excessive neuronal firing, promotes relaxation, and aids in sleep. Understanding GABA’s role is critical for unraveling brain functions and addressing neurological disorders. However, studying inhibitory neurons in the cerebral cortex remains challenging due to tool limitations. Disruptions in excitatory and inhibitory signals can cause severe conditions like seizures, emphasizing the importance of understanding inhibitory interneurons, particularly in sensory processing and visual stimuli response.

Parvalbumin-positive (PV⁺) and Somatostatin-positive (SST⁺) inhibitory interneurons are key subtypes involved in shaping visual stimuli processing. Despite their importance, the distinct functional roles of these subtypes and their connectivity with pyramidal cells remain unclear. Precise quantitative data is essential to advance our understanding of brain circuits and aid in developing treatments for neurological conditions such as Alzheimer’s, multiple sclerosis, and Parkinson’s. Moreover, these studies could inspire intelligent systems based on human brain principles.

Methods
The study relied on data from the Allen Institute, with electrophysiological recordings conducted using the patch-clamp technique on mice. These recordings analyzed neuron firing patterns under various stimuli, including short pulses, long steps, and natural noise. Adult mice aged 45–70 days were used, and brain slices were prepared under anesthesia using artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF).

Researchers employed generalized leaky integrate-and-fire (GLIF) models to mimic neuronal spiking behavior. Enhancements to the basic LIF model included post-spike currents, adaptive thresholding, and reset rules, which were calibrated using electrophysiology data. Model performance was assessed by comparing predicted and observed neuronal responses, with variance explained calculated across different timescales.

Results
Analysis revealed that additional mechanisms were necessary to replicate the spiking behavior of inhibitory and excitatory neurons accurately. The GLIF models explained a significant fraction of variance, with inhibitory neuron models generally outperforming excitatory ones. For instance, the GLIF₁ model explained 82% of inhibitory neuron variance but only 69% for excitatory neurons. Incorporating post-spike currents (GLIF₃) improved performance for inhibitory neurons (84%) but less so for excitatory neurons (65%).

Further refinements, such as adding reset rules and adaptive thresholding in the GLIF₄ model, enhanced variance explanation for both inhibitory (88%) and excitatory (79%) neurons. However, directly measuring the reset rule hindered subthreshold voltage reproduction. While GLIF₄ models achieved better spike time predictions, they struggled with replicating subthreshold behavior, highlighting a trade-off between these aspects.

The study also examined the correlation between subthreshold voltage accuracy and spike timing. Although a general correlation existed, replicating subthreshold voltage did not guarantee better spike timing. The findings underscore the distinct effects of post-spike currents and adaptive mechanisms on different neuron types.

Conclusion
The research demonstrated that GLIF models effectively replicate biological neuronal spike patterns with minimal parameters. Enhanced models, like GLIF₃ and GLIF₄, outperform simpler ones in reproducing spike times and differentiating transgenic neuron types through clustering. While adding complexity improves model accuracy initially, excessive parameters may lead to overfitting and diminishing returns, complicating further optimization.

Electrophysiological features can classify neuron types and provide insights into input-output relationships. However, identifying critical features or integrating comprehensive spike sequence data remains vital. Biophysically detailed models, aligned with biological mechanisms, offer a robust approach for advancing our understanding of neuronal behavior and addressing neurological disorders.

     
Type of Study: Research |
Received: 2024/12/10 | Accepted: 2025/03/4 | Published: 2025/03/13

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb