یکشنبه 15 تیر 1404
| English
جلد 25 - Special Issue
جلد 25 - Special Issue صفحات 0-37 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Haghi M, Najafian A, Yousefi Rad F, Morad Sahraee R. The analysis of Non-Persian speakers’ errors in using simple prepositions in written Persian texts: A cognitive approach. Advances in Cognitive Sciences 2023; 25 :37-0
URL: http://icssjournal.ir/article-1-1590-fa.html
URL: http://icssjournal.ir/article-1-1590-fa.html
Haghi Masoomeh، Najafian Arezoo، Yousefi Rad Fatemeh، Morad Sahraee Reza. The analysis of Non-Persian speakers’ errors in using simple prepositions in written Persian texts: A cognitive approach. تازه های علوم شناختی. 1402; 25 () :37-0
1- Department of Linguistics, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Linguistics, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran- Department of Linguistics, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
3- Department of Linguistics, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Linguistics, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran- Department of Linguistics, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
3- Department of Linguistics, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده: (725 مشاهده)
Factors like polysemy, diversified usage of prepositions in different contexts, and collocation of prepositions with special verbs make non-Persian speakers’ Persian learning challenging. This research focuses on the type and frequency of errors in using simple prepositions in Sa’adi Foundation’s corpus of written texts, presenting new analytical cognitive theories. Following the descriptive-analytical method, this article extracts data on a systematic random sampling basis from the corpus of texts written by non-Persian speakers in six different competency levels. One hundred six samples of texts written by the statistical population were randomly selected from the corpus of 535 texts, extracting a collection of 1,369 phrases/clauses. Then errors in using simple Persian prepositions in the sentences were identified and classified. Results showed that errors in using prepositions could be classified into three groups: “Illogical Addition,” “Illogical Omission,” and “Substitution of Wrong Preposition,” each having sub-divisions. Afterward, errors were analyzed based on Lakoff’s (1987) and Johnson’s (1987) image schema theory and Tyler and Evans’s (2003) Principled Polysemy. Analysis of errors showed that the cognitive system’s principled polysemy is formed in learners’ minds while making errors in using special prepositions in parallel paths, too. One reason for such errors is that different prepositional concepts are taught in isolation. Any endeavor in cognitive linguistics that successfully relates the prototypical meaning and peripheral meanings will help connect prepositions’ conceptual network. When teaching prepositions, teachers should consider their semantic networks.
واژه‌های کلیدی: Cognitive linguistics، Prepositions، Error، Prototypical meaning، Peripheral meaning
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي اصیل |
موضوع مقاله:
فلسفه ذهن و زبان شناسی شناختی
دریافت: 1402/3/31 | پذیرش: 1402/3/30 | انتشار: 1402/3/30
دریافت: 1402/3/31 | پذیرش: 1402/3/30 | انتشار: 1402/3/30
ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
